.
Membrane proteins represent one of the most important classes of therapeutic targets, including GPCRs, ion channels, transporters, receptor tyrosine kinases, and immune checkpoint molecules. Despite their biological significance, membrane proteins remain among the most challenging targets for antibody discovery.
Nanobodies are particularly well suited for membrane protein targeting due to their small size, excellent stability, and ability to recognize conformational or cryptic epitopes that may be inaccessible to conventional antibodies.
Low expression levels, structural instability after purification, poor solubility, and difficulty maintaining native conformations often limit the effectiveness of conventional discovery approaches. These challenges are especially pronounced for multi-pass transmembrane proteins and conformationally sensitive targets.
To improve discovery success against difficult membrane targets, our platform integrates native-conformation immunization strategies, membrane mimetic technologies, cell-based screening, and multiple display platforms to enable efficient identification of high-quality membrane protein binders.
Native-Conformation Immunization Strategies
We support multiple antigen presentation approaches to preserve membrane protein structure during immunization, including:
Cell-based immunization
Virus-like particles (VLPs)
LNP-mRNA immunization
Viral vector-based expression
Membrane mimetic systems
These strategies help maintain physiologically relevant conformations for difficult membrane targets.
Cell-Based Screening
Phage display screening can be performed directly against target-expressing cells to enrich binders recognizing native membrane protein conformations.
Quantitative Yeast Display Screening
FACS-based yeast display screening supports affinity- and specificity-driven enrichment under tightly controlled selection conditions.
Flexible Discovery Routes
Immunization-Based Discovery
Recommended for:
Therapeutic discovery programs
Difficult membrane protein targets
High-affinity binder generation
Workflow:
Camelid immunization → Immune library construction → Screening & Monoclonal selection → Candidate validation
Premade Library Screening
Recommended for:
Rapid target validation
Early-stage exploratory studies
Fast binder identification
Workflow:
Premade library screening → Screening & Monoclonal selection → Candidate validation
GPCRs
Ion channels
Transporters
Receptor tyrosine kinases
Viral envelope proteins
Cell-surface receptors
Clients will receive:
Membrane protein-binding nanobody sequences
Candidate binder analysis report
Expression-ready constructs (optional)
Binding validation data (optional)
Comprehensive project report
Optional downstream services:
Option 1 — Immunization-Based Discovery
|
Stage |
Deliverables |
Timeline |
|
Immunization |
Serum titer report |
8 weeks |
|
Library construction |
Immune phage or yeast display library |
3–4 weeks |
|
Library screening |
Enriched binder sequences and screening report |
4-6 weeks |
|
Optional candidate production |
Purified VHH and expression-ready constructs |
2–3 weeks |
|
Optional validation |
Binding and functional assay data |
2–4 weeks |
Typical total timeline:
Approximately 15-18 weeks depending on project complexity and screening strategy.
Option 2 — Premade Library Screening
|
Stage |
Deliverables |
Timeline |
|
Library screening |
Enriched CAR-oriented binder sequences |
4-6 weeks |
|
Optional candidate production |
Purified VHH or expression-ready constructs |
2–3 weeks |
|
Optional validation |
Binding and functional assay data |
2–4 weeks |
Typical total timeline:
Approximately 4–13 weeks depending on validation requirements.
Multiple membrane protein immunization strategies
Native-conformation screening approaches
Strong expertise in difficult targets
Advanced phage and yeast display technologies
Cell-based validation workflows
Flexible downstream engineering support
Case Study